The Call Blog: Mayor Bloomberg Says NYPD Is "Under Attack" By Critics

Have something to tell us at The Call? Drop us a line at thecall@ny1.com and we'll post it to our blog.

City Comptroller and mayoral candidate John Liu put it perfectly today when he said, "[The Mayor's] presenting a false choice, that people either are safe, or people have rights." New Yorkers have a right to feel safe in their neighborhoods. They shouldn't fear criminals, nor should they fear racial profiling and mistreatment from those who are sworn to protect them.

Mayor Bloomberg launched into a spirited defense of the NYPD after meeting with top police brass today. Bloomberg said "the NYPD is under attack" by mayoral candidates who are "playing politics with public safety." He said those who want to reform Stop, Question and Frisk and create an Inspector General to oversee the department have no role in keeping New York City safe.

The 22-minute speech was described by the Associated Press as a "stepped-up, aggressive response to those who question whether the nation's largest police department has overstepped its bounds." Public Advocate and mayoral candidate Bill de Blasio called the speech "fear-mongering." What do you say?

Are criticisms of some of the NYPD tactics justified? Do you agree with Mayor Bloomberg that police are "under attack" by candidates looking to score political points? Do you want to see an Inspector General position created? Would you reform Stop, Question and Frisk?

Send your thoughts using the link above.

Like a kid mayor Bloomberg likes to throw a tantrum when you criticize anything his administration does, and in the case of stop and frisk there is plenty to criticize, most glaring is statistics that show the a high percentage of those stopped are Latino or Black who are eventually let go far lack of evidence, statistics also show that the policy does not reduce crime as much as it does in creating friction between communities of color and the police, further hampering crime fighting efforts.

Felix Bay Ridge

He's losing it and quickly because now this dictatorship that he has created is
slipping away and by no means am I in favor any of these so called wanna be
politicians.

The first phone call to you yesterday was i believe a council member. She and
all the others which also play the role of bobble head have no polish. This is
not a game. This is New York and we have had enough of all of these same old
faces and the new creations by this Quinn is a joke.

Quinn looks as though she has already taken over and these people are a
creation of what she has become. So here's where it gets this is when she start
to play the spiteful game of hers and holds back funds which are i might ad are
our hard earned tax payers money.

SOMEONE HAD BETTER REEL HER IN!
WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IS WHAT HAS SHE AND
ALL THE OTHERS ACCOMPLISHED IN THEIR 3RD TERMS.
YOU ALL ARE GETTING PAID AND YOU STILL HAVE A FEW
MONTHS TO GO BEFORE WE SAY SAYONARA!

maxxiee
mp

Amazing that Bloomberg is sticking up for the NYPD while he puts the NYC Teachers down every chance he gets.

However, the NYPD deserve all the praise available. They do a great job each and every day and risk their lives every time they walk out their front door. I believe the NYPD is doing well and there is no need for an Inspector General's position. Take that money and give the NYPD a new contract with a pay increase. Bloomberg's big on putting people at desks, doing nothing. That's true for every City department.

Jessica, Arden Heights, Staten Island

Fear mongering. All I heard is 9/11 and Boston. This is also to prop up Quinn. The whole thing was a shame.

Rich Midtown East

Criticism of some NYPD tactics are justifiable and the police are not under attack as mayoral candidates are telling the truth. NO we do not need an IG, just the discontinuance of stop question and frisk, a blatant form of racial profiling.

Joyce
Springfield Garden, NY

Criticisms of the police are justified. Criticisms of the Mayor are also justified.

Joe
Port Richmond, SI

I agree with the Mayor. Mayoral Candidates are using public safety as a stepping stone to office, unfortunately there is no middle of the road when it come to public safety. If stop and frisk goes away, who wins? But the bigger question is, who loses?

Roscoe
Park Hill

It can be fine-tuned but frankly although I'm pretty Liberal regarding civil liberties in an era of enemy Jihadist combatants who are Americans requiring they be Mirandised Im fine with stop and frisk. We live in a dangerous world and political correctness and terrorism are oxymoronic in many instances. Its good reality testing and sound Law enforcement.

JS
Flushing

I agree with the Mayoral Candidates, I would like to see an Inspector General overseeing the police. The police need some supervision because this "stop and frisk" have only served to harass minority citizens. They have become vigilantes and a lot of them make the streets unsafe.

Theresa
Upperwestside

It's called politics. Mr. Mayor can dish it out but can't take the heat. Who is the mayor intending to stop, question and frisk? Is he going to go to Times Square and frisk people who a police officer thinks is suspicious? Is he going to Madison Avenue? If not, he's saying terror suspects come from poor, minority communities.

Tony

The candidates are obviously playing to the minority vote and will change nothing once in office. Dirty politics rules yet another mayoral election.

Steve
Forest Hills

The mayor and rabid Doberman police commissioner Kelly think safety is paramount above individual civil rights and that we should genuflect at their feet. They need a IG to keep them in check and hold them accountable, and what nerve to lay ground work for the incoming mayor elect.

Joe
Middle Village

Statistics that something is effective is NEVER enough to justify bypassing Constitutional rights. If unwarranted invasions into people's homes, purely through a random selection process, resulted in the regular discovery of illegal drugs and firearms, would we suddenly conclude that such government action is justified? Absolutely not. But yet we are willing to entertain Commissioner Kelleys' recitation of stats to justify the use of stop and frisk? These decisions should be made purely on a case-by-case basis, and not intentionally practiced in one neighborhood or on one race over another.

Fabio
Harlem

THE MAJOR KNOWS SOME OF HIS POLICIES ARE COMING TO A END. GOOD RIDDANCE AND DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU ON THE WAY OUT.

PEDRO BRONX

Its great that the crime rate is low. But might that have something to do with the fact that NYC has about the highest living standard of any city in the world? Only wealthy people can afford to live here for the most part. And although these people commit plenty of crimes; they aren't the types of crimes which go into the stats they are referring to.

Daphne, Manhattan

THE WORLD BEING A DANGEROUS PLACE THERE WILL ALWAYS IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER BE A FORM OF SQ&F. ITS GONNA GET WORSE.

JIMMY. BRONX

Stop and Frisk needs to be stopped. I have seen the police strip search a young white man in the street for no reason, it was absolutely horrible. I can't imagine what minorities go through. I guess it's the same reason why some NYPD officers say that they need to meet a quota of traffic tickets. Nothing that Bloomberg does makes any sense.

Anna

The mayor is one to talk about any city agency under attack!! What about his all out attack on education, public school teachers and the children of NYC!! What about his attack against the FDNY?? Now he wants to blame others for using his tactics! Under attack - Mayor Bloomberg brought this nastiness to a higher level!

Elima

700,000 stops, vs. 800 weapons found. I think the numbers speak for themselves as to how ineffective this is in terms of resources and loss of freedom.

I suspect the number is very close to what would be achieved randomly and thus indicates this is not a worthwhile process as the police cannot articulate any genuine reason for most of the stops that could be considered as being derived from trained policing.

"The right of the People to be secure in their Persons..." is not just meaningless drivel.

When you fear to walk down a public street because of armed, dangerous people stopping you and demanding things of you for no real reason, it matters little if they are gang bangers,police or government officials, you are not secure.

One of the most basic freedoms is the right to simply be left alone.

Angel in Harlem

The stop and frisk policy is about as racist and denigrating and anything could get. How would Bloomberg like it if Jews were targeted for some sort of harassment because the "might be up to no good?"

Frances
East Village

That guy Richard that just called is a lying idiot. Of course now that NYPD stats don't support his viewpoints, he has black friends from the projects that hide guns from police. What a convenience!

Tiffany

the idea that blacks and latinos are more likely to commit crimes is an evil stereotype...stop and frisk should be tried in white neighborhoods lets c how long they could have gotten away with it

Nasrtaha

Of course these are unimpressive politicians trying to impress the minority communities that basically they will allowed to continue committing crimes. Until there family member is gunned downed and then they'll be singing a different tune.

This is a pathetic group of mayoral wannabees. I really think we are going to be in big trouble if any of them becomes our next mayor.

God Bless the NYPD.

kate
midtown east

I say stop all stop and frisk. Instead give harsh prison time when caught with a gun or for using a un. It's time to get rough with criminals

mnmnus

All of the people complaining about stop and frisk argue that only 10% result in arrests. Why isn't anyone talking about the 10% of murderers, rapists, bail jumpers, fugitives wanted in other jurisdictions and people with outstanding warrants that are taken off the street and compelled to face justice. Stop playing the race card. It's so old.

Eddie

Half a million unwarranted stops, militarized police patrolling with heavy weaponry, bag searches without probable cause at subway entrances, unlawful arrests and mass sweeps at political protests such as the RNC and Occupy-you live in a security state-a police state-with demagogues like Bloomberg the politics of the National Socialists live.

Carl
Soho

I can not believe that anyone would associate stop and frisk with probable cause. The police have always had the right to stop someone under probable cause, even enter your home. That law has been on the books for over 50 years. Stop and frisk serves only one purpose, Minorities are targeted. It servers no purpose except to build hostility against the public towards the police. If this was the Mayors children being harassed, he would have got rid of it himself a long time ago. But as we all know he would not allow that in his neighborhood.

Raheem from Jamaica Queens

In Bloomberg's NY, stop and frisk is just a euphemism for racial profiling. However, this policy works because young black and hispanic men commit most of the street crime.

Steve
College Point

Rudy G. was considered tough on crime, but the NYPD only stopped 100,000 a year versus Mike's 700,000 a year! This is why the NYPD is being criticized. It is the Mayor's fault for giving Kelly Carte Blance, and the cops are paying for it.

Mario
Chelsea

I don't get it. I am black, and I see how the youth act. They are animals. I have no problem with stop n frisk. The blacks and Hispanic commit most of the gun crimes in Ny.

I am so tired or The blacks and Hispanic crying wolf(color).

Naqam

Is stop and frisk racial profiling and a form of discrimination -- there seems to be two sides to this story and a matter of opinion. However it is quite telling that the vast majority of stop & frisks are of Hispanics and Black men. But Mayor Bloomberg 's claim that he never plays politics with peoples' lives is outrageous. Is he not the one who plays politics with the lives of children in NYC with his educational policies? Is he not the one who is plays politics when he opens charter schools and closes public schools over the massive cries of parents and children? And now does it not appear that he is playing politics with the lives of New Yorkers by outwardly criticizing Ms. Quinn through the front door but politically supporting her through the back door?

Perhaps Mayor Bloomberg is correct that Stop & Frisk policy is the first line of defense against crime in New York City and maybe the NYPD is not racial profiling. But one thing is for sure Mayor Bloomberg is undoubtedly the Master of the Masquerade.

Lisa
Upper east side

It was embarrassing to witness Bloomberg's rant about the virtue of civil right's violations by the NYPD. Even the audience of NYPD personnel gave a tepid applause. It was hard to watch, the feeble rationale with ringing racist undertones.

k
harlem

Nearly 90% of stops lead to no arrest or summons.

Less than 1% result in the recovery of a gun/weapon.

John indicated that the 90% number had to with not finding a weapon. The weapon failure rate is actually approximately 99%; the arrest/summons failure rate is nearly 90%.

Mandela
Downtown Brooklyn

Its funny how most of the people in favor of stop and frisk, live affluent neighborhoods and are white..smh

Kyle from East Harlem

Source: http://www.ny1.com/content/the_call/the_call_blog/181293/the-call-blog--mayor-bloomberg-says-nypd-is--under-attack--by-critics

aziz ansari aziz ansari katherine jenkins peyton manning broncos mexico city earthquake stand your ground law dancing with the stars season 14

Seth Rogen Dances with The Backstreet Boys: Watch Now!

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/04/seth-rogen-dances-with-the-backstreet-boys-watch-now/

WRAL John Harbaugh jill biden jill biden martin luther king jr baltimore ravens ravens

Army says no to more tanks, but Congress insists

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Built to dominate the enemy in combat, the Army's hulking Abrams tank is proving equally hard to beat in a budget battle.

Lawmakers from both parties have devoted nearly half a billion dollars in taxpayer money over the past two years to build improved versions of the 70-ton Abrams.

But senior Army officials have said repeatedly, "No thanks."

It's the inverse of the federal budget world these days, in which automatic spending cuts are leaving sought-after pet programs struggling or unpaid altogether. Republicans and Democrats for years have fought so bitterly that lawmaking in Washington ground to a near-halt.

Yet in the case of the Abrams tank, there's a bipartisan push to spend an extra $436 million on a weapon the experts explicitly say is not needed.

"If we had our choice, we would use that money in a different way," Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army's chief of staff, told The Associated Press this past week.

Why are the tank dollars still flowing? Politics.

Keeping the Abrams production line rolling protects businesses and good paying jobs in congressional districts where the tank's many suppliers are located.

If there's a home of the Abrams, it's politically important Ohio. The nation's only tank plant is in Lima. So it's no coincidence that the champions for more tanks are Rep. Jim Jordan and Sen. Rob Portman, two of Capitol's Hill most prominent deficit hawks, as well as Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown. They said their support is rooted in protecting national security, not in pork-barrel politics.

"The one area where we are supposed to spend taxpayer money is in defense of the country," said Jordan, whose district in the northwest part of the state includes the tank plant.

The Abrams dilemma underscores the challenge that Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel faces as he seeks to purge programs that the military considers unnecessary or too expensive in order to ensure there's enough money for essential operations, training and equipment.

Hagel, a former Republican senator from Nebraska, faces a daunting task in persuading members of Congress to eliminate or scale back projects favored by constituents.

Federal budgets are always peppered with money for pet projects. What sets the Abrams example apart is the certainty of the Army's position.

Sean Kennedy, director of research for the nonpartisan Citizens Against Government Waste, said Congress should listen when one of the military services says no to more equipment.

"When an institution as risk averse as the Defense Department says they have enough tanks, we can probably believe them," Kennedy said.

Congressional backers of the Abrams upgrades view the vast network of companies, many of them small businesses, that manufacture the tanks' materials and parts as a critical asset that has to be preserved. The money, they say, is a modest investment that will keep important tooling and manufacturing skills from being lost if the Abrams line were to be shut down.

The Lima plant is a study in how federal dollars affect local communities, which in turn hold tight to the federal dollars. The facility is owned by the federal government but operated by the land systems division of General Dynamics, a major defense contractor that spent close to $11 million last year on lobbying, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

The plant is Lima's fifth-largest employer with close to 700 employees, down from about 1,100 just a few years ago, according to Mayor David Berger. But the facility is still crucial to the local economy. "All of those jobs and their spending activity in the community and the company's spending probably have about a $100 million impact annually," Berger said.

Jordan, a House conservative leader who has pushed for deep reductions in federal spending, supported the automatic cuts known as the sequester that require $42 billion to be shaved from the Pentagon's budget by the end of September. The military also has to absorb a $487 billion reduction in defense spending over the next 10 years, as required by the Budget Control Act passed in 2011.

Still, said Jordan, it would be a big mistake to stop producing tanks.

"Look, (the plant) is in the 4th Congressional District and my job is to represent the 4th Congressional District, so I understand that," he said. "But the fact remains, if it was not in the best interests of the national defense for the United States of America, then you would not see me supporting it like we do."

The tanks that Congress is requiring the Army to buy aren't brand new. Earlier models are being outfitted with a sophisticated suite of electronics that gives the vehicles better microprocessors, color flat panel displays, a more capable communications system, and other improvements. The upgraded tanks cost about $7.5 million each, according to the Army.

Out of a fleet of nearly 2,400 tanks, roughly two-thirds are the improved versions, which the Army refers to with a moniker that befits their heft: the M1A2SEPv2, and service officials said they have plenty of them. "The Army is on record saying we do not require any additional M1A2s," Davis Welch, deputy director of the Army budget office, said this month.

The tank fleet, on average, is less than 3 years old. The Abrams is named after Gen. Creighton Abrams, one of the top tank commanders during World War II and a former Army chief of staff.

The Army's plan was to stop buying tanks until 2017, when production of a newly designed Abrams would begin. Orders for Abrams tanks from U.S. allies help fill the gap created by the loss of tanks for the Army, according to service officials, but congressional proponents of the program feared there would not be enough international business to keep the Abrams line going.

This pause in tank production for the U.S. would allow the Army to spend its money on research and development work for the new and improved model, said Ashley Givens, a spokeswoman for the Army's Ground Combat Systems office.

The first editions of the Abrams tank were fielded in the early 1980s. Over the decades, the Abrams supply chain has become embedded in communities across the country.

General Dynamics estimated in 2011 that there were more than 560 subcontractors throughout the country involved in the Abrams program and that they employed as many as 18,000 people. More than 40 of the companies are in Pennsylvania, according to Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa., also a staunch backer of continued tank production.

A letter signed by 173 Democratic and Republican members of the House last year and sent to then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta demonstrated the depth of bipartisan support for the Abrams program on Capitol Hill. They chided the Obama administration for neglecting the industrial base and proposing to terminate tank production in the United States for the first time since World War II.

Portman, who served as President George W. Bush's budget director before being elected to the Senate, said allowing the line to wither and close would create a financial mess.

"People can't sit around for three years on unemployment insurance and wait for the government to come back," Portman said. "That supply chain is going to be much more costly and much more inefficient to create if you mothball the plant."

Pete Keating, a General Dynamics spokesman, said the money from Congress is allowing for a stable base of production for the Army, which receives about four tanks a month. With the line open, Lima also can fill international orders, bringing more work to Lima and preserving American jobs, he said.

Current foreign customers are Saudi Arabia, which is getting about five tanks a month, and Egypt, which is getting four. Each country pays all of their own costs. That's a "success story during a period of economic pain," Keating said.

Still, far fewer tanks are coming out of the Lima plant than in years past. The drop-off has affected companies such as Verhoff Machine and Welding in Continental, Ohio, which makes seats and other parts for the Abrams. Ed Verhoff, the company's president, said his sales have dropped from $20 million to $7 million over the past two years. He's also had to lay off about 25 skilled employees and he expects to be issuing more pink slips in the future.

"When we start to lose this base of people, what are we going to do? Buy our tanks from China?" Verhoff said.

Steven Grundman, a defense expert at the Atlantic Council in Washington, said the difficulty of reviving defense industrial capabilities tends to be overstated.

"From the fairly insular world in which the defense industry operates, these capabilities seem to be unique and in many cases extraordinarily high art," said Grundman, a former deputy undersecretary of defense for industrial affairs and installations during the Clinton administration. "But in the greater scope of the economy, they tend not to be."

___

Online:

Abrams tank: http://www.army.mil/factfiles/equipment/tracked/abrams.html

__

Follow Richard Lardner on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rplardner

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/army-says-no-more-tanks-congress-insists-115422396.html

taylor allderdice vincent jackson vicki gunvalson pierre garcon brown recluse spider wiz khalifa taylor allderdice eddie royal

Why This Prom in Georgia Just Changed History

Earlier this month, TakePart reported on the efforts of a group of high school students in Georgia raising funds to hold their county?s first multi-racial prom?otherwise known as regular prom in the rest of the country.

Last night, those kids got their wish at Wilcox County's first-ever "Integrated Prom," where students of all races were welcome. By all accounts, it was a remarkably successful event.

According to local crews, the entrance to the dance was so swarmed with news cameras, it resembled something closer to a Hollywood red carpet event, rather than a high school dance. Students made their way in front of reporters, stopping for pictures while throngs of parents cheered them on and held back tears.

Quanesha Wallace, one of the students responsible for organizing the event, told one news reporter, ?It turned out really well. I didn?t even know this many people were coming. I didn?t even know this many tickets were being sold.?

?

?

Wilcox County, GA has had a segregated prom system since the school was racially integrated just several decades ago. The school's dances have always been privately funded and held away from school grounds, allowing for the segregation to continue without any legal consequence.

But this year, a group of students at Wilcox County High School had enough, with one in particular, Keela Bloodworth, explaining to WSFA, ?It?s embarrassing to know that I?m from the county that still does this.?

That?s when Bloodworth, Wallace, and a goup of their friends decided to raise funds on their own to hold an integrated prom. While their initial thoughts were of local bake sales and car washes, those became unnecessary once online news sites got a hold of their story. Just two days after that story broke, those students reached their funding goal, according to their Facebook page. Then they quickly surpassed it.

Since then, they?ve continued to collect donations from supporters across the country, with the excess money going towards their own college scholarships, as well as to funds for two unidentified local families, each of whom have recently ?suffered a major loss.?

In the weeks leading up to the dance, the students reported there had been some community backlash, mostly in the form of their fliers getting ripped down and disappearing.

And though several of Georgia?s lawmakers publicly championed the students? efforts, Georgia?s own governor, Nathan Deal initially refused to comment on the events because he didn't "want to take sides," according to a statement released by his spokesperson.

Nonetheless, after several weeks of mounting public pressure, Deal did release a carefully-worded statement, that concluded with, ?I think that people understand that some of these are just local issues and private issues, and not something that the state government needs to have its finger involved in.? And that may explain why segregation is alive and well in Georgia.

While their governor seemed content to sit this one out, these very determined high school students took it upon themselves to effect a change in their county, one that will hopefully be recognized for generations to come. In the meantime, if these are the kids who are representative of our future, we might be okay.

What would be your response if you found out that your county held segregated proms? Let us know in the Comments.

Related Stories on TakePart:

? These Los Angeles Cops Are Super-Excited About Taffeta and Tiaras

? What Every Parent Should Know: How to Help Your Kids Deal With Peer Conflicts at School

? Could Compassion Be the Key to Reducing Dropout Rates?

---

A Bay Area native, Andri Antoniades previously worked as a fashion industry journalist and medical writer.??In addition to reporting the weekend news on TakePart, she volunteers as a webeditor for locally-based nonprofits and works as a freelance feature writer for?TimeOutLA.com.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/why-prom-georgia-just-changed-history-185442149.html

2012 grammys foo fighters nikki minaj album of the year grammy red carpet grammy award winners the band perry

Town under siege by river seeks buyout (Providence Journal)

Share With Friends: | | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/301428689?client_source=feed&format=rss

Claire Danes Amy Poehler Australian Open Girls Hbo Golden Globes homeland homeland

Samsung reportedly launching new 8-inch tablet in June, Galaxy S 4 Active in July

Samsung Gulf president Young Soo Kim reportedly made casual mention of an upcoming rugged take on the Galaxy S 4 at a press event earlier in the week, but left out any details. Sources for the Wall Street Journal claim to know more of the story, and it sounds like the toughened phone won't be alone this summer. The Galaxy S 4 Active, as it's rumored to be called, would arrive in July and carry the dust- and waterproofing of spiritual predecessors like the Galaxy Xcover 2 while maintaining the GS 4's design language. A smaller, 4.3-inch parallel to the GS 4 would appear at the same time -- Galaxy S 4 Mini, anyone? The same tipsters also expect the release of a new 8-inch "Galaxy-line tablet" in June, which suggests the Galaxy Note 8.0 may get a regular Tab counterpart. We wouldn't base our buying strategies around the rumors when Samsung hasn't said anything that's truly on the record, but it might be wise to hold off if you're not in a rush.

Filed under: Cellphones, Tablets, Mobile, Samsung

Comments

Source: Wall Street Journal

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/UQYXvR8iaaE/

Ravi Shankar Geminid meteor shower right to work Clackamas Town Center 12 12 12 Anne Hathaway Wardrobe Malfunction Adrienne Maloof

France legalizes gay marriage after harsh debate

PARIS (AP) ? France legalized gay marriage on Tuesday after a wrenching national debate and protests that flooded the streets of Paris. Legions of officers and water cannon stood ready near France's National Assembly ahead of the final vote, bracing for possible violence on an issue that galvanized the country's faltering conservative movement.

The measure passed easily in the Socialist-majority Assembly, 331-225, just minutes after the president of the legislative body expelled a disruptive protester in pink, the color adopted by French opponents of gay marriage.

"Only those who love democracy are here," Claude Bartelone, the Assembly president, said angrily.

In recent weeks, violent attacks against gay couples have spiked and some legislators have received threats ? including Bartelone, who got a gunpowder-filled envelope on Monday.

One of the biggest protests against same-sex marriage drew together hundreds of thousands of people bused in from the French provinces ? conservative activists, schoolchildren with their parents, retirees, priests and others. That demonstration ended in blasts of tear gas, as right-wing rabble-rousers, some in masks and hoods, led the charge against police, damaging cars along the Champs-Elysees avenue and making a break for the presidential palace.

Justice Minister Christiane Taubira told lawmakers that the first weddings could be as soon as June.

"We believe that the first weddings will be beautiful and that they'll bring a breeze of joy, and that those who are opposed to them today will surely be confounded when they are overcome with the happiness of the newlyweds and the families," she said.

When President Francois Hollande promised to legalize gay marriage, it was seen as relatively uncontroversial. But the issue has become a touchstone as his popularity has sunk to unprecedented lows, largely over France's ailing economy.

But the most visible face in the fight against gay marriage ? a former comedienne who goes by the name of Frigide Barjot ? said the movement named "A Protest for Everyone" will continue beyond the law's passage and possibly field candidates in 2014 municipal elections. She said anyone involved in protest violence would be marginalized, but blamed the government for its failure to listen.

"The violence comes from the way in which this was imposed," Barjot told France Info radio.

French conservatives, decimated by infighting and the election loss of standard-bearer Nicolas Sarkozy, had found a rallying cause in same-sex marriage. Hoping to keep the issue alive, the conservative UMP party planned to challenge the law in the Constitutional Council.

French civil unions, allowed since 1999, are at least as popular among heterosexuals as among gay and lesbian couples. But that law has no provisions for adoption, and the strongest opposition in France as far as same-sex couples goes comes when children are involved. According to recent polls, just over half of French are opposed to adoption by same-sex couples ? about the same number who said they favored same-sex marriage.

Christophe Crepin, spokesman for the police union UNSA, says the extraordinary security Tuesday includes a total of about 4,000 officers in the area near the National Assembly building and water cannon positioned nearby. One group of anti-riot police swarmed the banks of the Seine River about a quarter-mile from the legislature, hours before protests were scheduled there.

France is the 14th country to legalize gay marriage. On the cover of Tuesday's Liberation newspaper, the famed gay photographers Pierre and Gilles took over the front page and several of the inside pages, splashing them with some of their most provocative photos, including one of three soccer players ? nude but for the footwear ? facing the camera.

In New Zealand, where gay marriage enjoys popular support, people gathered outside Parliament and joined in singing a traditional Maori love ballad after a vote last week making it legal. Nine states and the District of Columbia in the U.S. also recognize such marriages, but the federal government does not.

___

Follow Lori Hinnant at https://twitter.com/lhinnant

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/france-legalizes-gay-marriage-harsh-debate-151608251.html

steve nash july 4th Malware Monday First Row Sports American flag Happy 4th of July 4th Of July Desserts